YES! TOPICS 2018

Why don’t they care?
Nudges to improve willingness to help

 

This challenge was introduced by Lena Detlefsen and Katharina Lima de Miranda, Researchers, IfW Kiel Institute for the World Economy 

 

 

The media continually reports about the failure to provide help. For example, the failure to provide help in the case of a deceased pensioner in an Essen bank. The phenomenon can be seen in almost every country and happens in very different situations, for example mobbing, racism, accidents and attacks, where many people do not intervene and help even though they could. In addition to the personal suffering of the victim, failure to assist has social consequences for society as it reduces macroeconomic welfare.

 

Since the 1970s, research has focussed on the phenomenon of only a few people actually intervening and helping in these situations while the majority simply watch or just walk on by (the ‘bystander effect’).  There are various reasons why people don’t help. Studies show that the size of the group has an impact. It has been observed that the more people are witnessing an incident, the fewer people help those affected. A possible explanation for this behaviour is that people in groups don’t feel responsible or are afraid to act in a way that is wrong. The question of whether you belong to the same social group is just as important. People tend to help people from different social groups less often. The main reasons people help others include compassion, moral considerations and social norms that determine the give and take in society. Even role models can help persuade people to help.

 

Social media has created a new dynamic. Social media establishes a level of personal closeness and creates a friendly exchange, where crises and the suffering of others can be easily seen by the masses. Many aid activities, e.g. during the flood disaster in Magdeburg in 2013 or the refugee crisis in Germany in 2015, were planned and organised using social media. On the other hand, problems such as mobbing are getting worse due to the accessibility of victims, or the behaviour of onlookers when there are incidents, whereby they film what has happened on their phones and may even post it online later, instead of helping the victim.

 

 

‘Nudges’ could be a way of increasing the willingness to help. A nudge is a method that influences the behaviour of people without having to resort to bans or laws or having to change social incentives. Nudges are becoming a more popular way of influencing people’s behaviour as new laws or regulations do not have to be issued as policy. Nudges could help to overcome individual blocks such as fear or uncertainty concerning responsibility, thus increasing the level of social welfare.

 

In the last decade, measures were implemented time and again to increase the willingness to help. As an example, successful impetus included:

 

– Making people aware of stereotypes (Scottish people helped others more when they heard they were considered to be unfriendly and unhelpful).

– Evoking empathy by using posters/videos.

– Police advice to not direct cries for help at the general public, but specifically towards one person.

– With respect to organ donors, it was shown that in countries with an opt-in rule, like Germany, where each has to make a conscious decision to donate organs, the willingness to donate organs was several times lower than in countries with an opt-out rule, where individuals have to explicitly indicate that they do not want their organs to be removed after they die.

Recommended literature

 

http://www.allgemeine-zeitung.de/vermischtes/leben-und-wissen/zuschauereffekt-warum-wir-menschen-in-notsituationen-nicht-helfen_16131213.htm

 

https://www.tz.de/welt/kann-jeder-zeuge-fuer-einen-menschen-tun-verbal-angegriffen-wird-zr-8762856.html

 

http://www.ardmediathek.de/tv/Quarks/Die-Au%C3% 9Fenstehenden-warum-helfen-Sie-ni/WDR-Fernsehen/Video?bcastId=7450356&documentId=39337566

 

https://www.adac.de/_mmm/pdf/Signale_07_05_45185.pdf

 

Fischer, P., Krueger, J. I., Greitemeyer, T., Vogrincic, C., Kastenmüller, A., Frey, D., … & Kainbacher, M. (2011). The bystander-effect: a meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psychological bulletin, 137(4), 517.

 

Fischer, P., Greitemeyer, T., Pollozek, F., & Frey, D. (2006). The unresponsive bystander: Are bystanders more responsive in dangerous emergencies?. European journal of social psychology, 36(2), 267-278.

 

Latané, B., & Nida, S. (1981). Ten years of research on group size and helping. Psychological Bulletin, 89(2), 308.

 

Schnall, S., Roper, J., & Fessler, D. M. (2010). Elevation leads to altruistic behavior. Psychological science, 21(3), 315-320.

    Region North

     
     
     
     

    Academic Partner

    The Kiel Institute is an international center for research in global economic affairs, economic policy consulting, and economic education.

    The Institute engages especially in creating solutions to urgent problems in global economic affairs. On basis of its research, the Institute advises decision makers in policy, business, and society and informs the broader public about important developments in international economic policy.

    As a portal to research in global economic affairs, the Kiel Institute has established a network of International Research Fellows that supports the worldwide awareness of the Institute’s activities and gives additional research impulses in form of scientific advice, joint research, and teaching stays in Kiel. The Institute lays a special focus on economic education and closely cooperates with the world’s largest library in economic and social sciences.

    The Kiel Institute has been partner of the YES! since 2015.