This project is supported by our academic partner Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW) in Mannheim and the researchers Paul Hufe and Carina Woodage.
“In this world, nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.” This is what Benjamin Franklin wrote in a letter in 1789. Yet, is this still a certainty in a globalised world? Revelations like the “Panama Papers” or about the tricks football players like Christiano Ronaldo and others used to evade taxes let us have doubts. Yet, taxes are indispensable to provide public goods and services like schools, hospitals and roads. For modern welfare states, taxes are the primary instrument to redistribute income and to ensure that those in need are provided with essential supplies.
The German tax law connects a fair taxation closely with the principle of economic capacity. This principle requires that the taxation is oriented towards the capacity of the respective taxpayer. Thus, Germany has a progressive tariff on income tax. It means that those who have a higher income are burdened with a higher tax rate while families with children may set off the costs of child care against their tax liability.
However, in contrast to this fundamental principle, many people with high incomes try to evade their taxation obligations with the help of tax and financial consultants. A priori, it is unclear whether this behaviour results from personal interests or a differing understanding of a fair taxation. Undoubtedly, there is a blurry line between legal tax avoidance and illegal tax evasion.
The state has a set of different tools at hand to prevent an uneven share of tax burden. Existing loopholes, for instance, can be closed. In order to deter tax evasion, higher penalties were defined and, time and again, the financial authorities bought CDs with the names of tax evaders, which have led to an increase of voluntary declarations. In addition, new findings of behavioural economists point to new approaches. By nudging and a better information policy on how tax money is spent the tax morale of the citizens could improve.
Can “legal” be synonymous with “fair”? How could we solve the tax coordination and cooperation problems between sovereign states? What other concrete options – besides higher penalties – has a state to raise the tax compliance? How could tax enforcement be enhanced? Are there other opportunities to raise the tax morale within the society?
The topic “Modern Tax Policy: New Ways to Promote Fairness and Efficiency” can be selected by YES! teams from the region South-West as a YES! 2017 topic.
The students of the YES! team of the Albert-Einstein-Gymnasium Ulm have chosen this topic.
The project “Modern Tax Policy: New Ways to Promote Fairness and Efficiency” was proposed by researchers of the Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW) in Mannheim. The YES!-teams are supported by the researchers Paul Hufe and Carina Woodage.
The ZBW is the world’s largest information centre for economic literature and excellently positioned to help students gain information literacy and provide relevant resources.
The Joachim Herz Stiftung is economically independent and politically neutral. The foundation has a wide experience in developing ideas and implementing projects for young people, in particular on economic education.
t: +49 (0) 431 8814 359
t: +49 (0) 431 8814 643
Photo credits (top to bottom): (c) shutterstock.com / Olivier Le Moal, (c) Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung GmbH (ZEW) Mannheim, (c) shutterstock.com / Olivier Le Moal, (c) ZBW – Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, (c) Joachim Herz Stiftung.